PART 01: Executive summary
• Highlights
PART 02: Key takeaways
PART 03: Market overview
• Assumptions
PART 04: Scope of the report
• Market overview
PART 05: Market research methodology
• Research methodology
• Economic indicators
PART 06: Introduction
• Key market highlights
PART 07: Market description
• Difference between RASP and web application firewall(WAF)
• Features of RASP
• Types of network attacks
• Types of attacks
PART 08: Market landscape
• Market overview
• Market size and forecast
• Five forces analysis
PART 09: Product life cycle analysis
PART 10: Market opportunities
• Implementation of BYOD policy in enterprises
• Stringent government regulations
PART 11: Market segmentation by end-user
• Global RASP security market by end-user 2015-2020
• Global RASP security market in large enterprises
• Global RASP security market in SMEs
PART 12: Geographical segmentation
• Segmentation of global RASP security market by geography 2014-2019
PART 13: Market attractiveness
• Market attractiveness by end-users
• Market attractiveness by geography
PART 14: Market drivers
• Ability of RASP to prevent advanced threats
• Internet attacks leading to growing demand for runtime security
• Need to improve quality of security
• Need to adhere to regulatory requirements
PART 15: Impact of drivers
PART 16: Market challenges
• High cost of deployment
• Emerging threat from open-source RASP
• Technical defects
• Adverse effect on network performance
PART 17: Impact of drivers and challenges
PART 18: Market trends
• Emergence of cloud-based RASP security solutions
• Increased demand from SMEs
• Increased number of DDoS attacks
• Increase in M&A
PART 19: Impact of trends
PART 20: Buying criteria
PART 21: Vendor landscape
• Top vendor offerings
• Competitive analysis
• Other prominent vendors
PART 22: Appendix
• List of abbreviations
PART 23: Explore Technavio
[List of Exhibits]
Exhibit 01: Application testing technology comparisons
Exhibit 02: Assumptions
Exhibit 03: Key countries considered
Exhibit 04: Difference between RASP and WAF
Exhibit 05: Types of network attacks
Exhibit 06: Types of attacks
Exhibit 07: Overview of global RASP security market
Exhibit 08: Global RASP security market 2015-2020 ($ millions)
Exhibit 09: Five forces analysis
Exhibit 10: Product life cycle
Exhibit 11: Regulations
Exhibit 12: Global RASP security market by end-user 2015-2020
Exhibit 13: Global RASP security market in large enterprises 2015-2020 ($ millions)
Exhibit 14: Global RASP security market in SMEs 2015-2020 ($ millions)
Exhibit 15: Global RASP security market by geography 2015-2020
Exhibit 16: RASP security market in Americas 2015-2020
Exhibit 17: RASP security market in EMEA 2015-2020
Exhibit 18: RASP security market in APAC 2015-2020
Exhibit 19: Market attractiveness by end-user 2015-2016
Exhibit 20: Market attractiveness by end-user 2019-2020
Exhibit 21: Market attractiveness by geography 2015-2016
Exhibit 22: Market attractiveness by geography 2019-2020
Exhibit 23: Regulation related to security threats
Exhibit 24: Impact of drivers
Exhibit 25: Impact of drivers and challenges
Exhibit 26: Major M&A
Exhibit 27: Impact of trends
Exhibit 28: Buying criteria
Exhibit 29: Top vendor offerings
Exhibit 30: Other prominent vendors
【掲載企業】
Cigital, HP, Veracode, WhiteHat Security, Arxan Technology, Contrast Security, CyberGRC, IMMUNIO, Prevoty, Vasco, Waratek.
【資料のキーワード】
ランタイムアプリケーションセルフプロテクション、RASPセキュリティ、ネットワークアプリケーション保護
【調査方法】
一次資料による調査(業界専門家、ベンダー、代理店、顧客等を対象にしたデプスインタビュー調査など)及び二次資料による調査(Technavio独自のプラットフォーム、産業書籍、企業報告書、ニュース記事、アナリストレポート、貿易協会、政府機関発行データなど)